Requiring labels on foods with genetically modified (GM) ingredients is unnecessary and presents no benefit for consumers, an editorial by the Hartford Courant—the nation’s oldest newspaper—states.

“The fight against genetically modified organisms is fueled more by fear and guesswork than by responsible evidence,” the article says. No credible scientific studies have shown that GM crops present a greater health risk than conventionally produced crops, it points out citing the position of the American Medical Association.

Furthermore, it says that labels are unnecessary because consumers can already identify GM foods: “These days, it’s a pretty safe bet that if you buy virtually any processed food, GMOs played a part in its manufacture; no label is necessary. Those who want non-GMO foods may look for the “USDA Organic” label, which indicates that no genetic modification took place.” Read more.